I do not like to see one company having too great a dominance in any market. I have long thought small touch screen portable PCs are a good idea; and then after years of negligible success Apple launch the iPad, as though it is a new idea, and make them fashionable. I hate Apple trying to stifle competition using alleged paten infringements, and trying to take extort money from using the iPad (to me if you buy hardware you should be able to do what you want with it). Thus I was pleased when HP said it was going to take Apple on; from my limited experience WebOS made sense.
I looked forward to the launch of HPs first touch screen, and a few days ago went to a PC shop to have a play with the HP TouchPad. My impression was that it was not perfect, but it was a good first attempt, and would be a stepping stone to a better machine. I would have bought one, however, Opera browser was/is not yet available for the TouchPad, and whilst I am happy to buy a tablet which helps open up the market, I do not wish to buy a tablet which will be used mainly for portable browsing, and will artificially inflate Apple Safari browser market share (see TouchPad Identification below). All things considered I decided that the TouchPad seemed a perfectly acceptable tablet, that I would buy when Opera became available.
Alas, this is a sad day because HP have decided to scrap their WebOS tablets and phones, but maybe I will be able to buy one cheap, and put a straight forward Linux distro on it!
TouchPad Identification
I recently reviewed the identification of the Blackberry Playbook by counters, and found it to suggest that Apple Safari browser usage was higher than it actually is, due to both browsers being based on the WebKit browser engine. Likewise, the TouchPad uses a WebKit based browser, and almost universally is counted as Safari:
Linux OS and Safari browser
ExtremeTracking
ShinyStats
Sitemeter
W3
BeOs (OS and browser)
BraveNet
Mac OS and Safari browser
OneStat
Default Browser
StatCounter
Browser String:
Mozilla/5.0 (hp-tablet; Linux; hpwOS/3.0.0; U; en-GB) AppleWebKit/534.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) wOSBrowser/233.70 Safari/534.6 TouchPad/1.0
Friday 19 August 2011
Saturday 25 June 2011
Blackberry PlayBook ID + Are WebKit Browsers Giving Appel Safari an Overstated Market Share?
Yeasterday I popped into a local computer store to have a play with the Blackberry PlayBook. I dis not spend enough time to write a worthwhile review, but by visiting this site I found that very few stats trackers correctly identify the PlayBook (listed Browser / OS):
Correctly Identified:
W3 - Blackberry PlayBook Tablet 1.0 / RIM Tablet
ExTreame Tracking - Blackberry PlayBook / Blackberry PlayBook
Near Miss:
Statcounter: Blackbery / Blackberry OS
ID As Apple Safari:
Shiny Stats - Safari / Various
Onestat - Safari / Macintosh
24Log - Safari / Other
SiteMeter - Safari 1.3 / Macintosh unknown
GoStats - Safari / Unknown
ID As BeOS:
BraveNet - BeOS / BeOS
From the above it is clear that few correctly identify the BlackBerry PlayBook, and most credit the WebKit Browser as being an Apple Safari browser. Surly, this causes Apples browser (and to a lesser expent Apples OS) to be regarded as more popular than it actually is?
PS Will be nice when BeOS actually does start making plenty of hits again!!
For the record the browser string was:
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayBook; U; RIM Tablet OS 1.0.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/0.0.1 Safari/534.8
Correctly Identified:
W3 - Blackberry PlayBook Tablet 1.0 / RIM Tablet
ExTreame Tracking - Blackberry PlayBook / Blackberry PlayBook
Near Miss:
Statcounter: Blackbery / Blackberry OS
ID As Apple Safari:
Shiny Stats - Safari / Various
Onestat - Safari / Macintosh
24Log - Safari / Other
SiteMeter - Safari 1.3 / Macintosh unknown
GoStats - Safari / Unknown
ID As BeOS:
BraveNet - BeOS / BeOS
From the above it is clear that few correctly identify the BlackBerry PlayBook, and most credit the WebKit Browser as being an Apple Safari browser. Surly, this causes Apples browser (and to a lesser expent Apples OS) to be regarded as more popular than it actually is?
PS Will be nice when BeOS actually does start making plenty of hits again!!
For the record the browser string was:
Mozilla/5.0 (PlayBook; U; RIM Tablet OS 1.0.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/0.0.1 Safari/534.8
Friday 3 June 2011
Fell Onto My Left Wrist Last Week
Thursday 5 May 2011
Lonliness of a FreeBSD Surfer
Earlier today I surfed onto a site called Pool tot Pool. Noticing an ExtremeTracking button I had a look - I just cannot help it! This tracker ha been running since 25th November 2006, in that time it has had 10,110 hits, yet I am the first person to surf onto the site using FreeBSD, and my visit puts FreeBSD usage to 0.01%.
However, Net Applications give the percentage Internet traffic for FreeBSD as 0.01%, so I suppose satistically, after 10,109 hits, it was time for me to find this site!
However, Net Applications give the percentage Internet traffic for FreeBSD as 0.01%, so I suppose satistically, after 10,109 hits, it was time for me to find this site!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)